Is this behavioral change in Clojure 1.6.0 expected? Under 1.6.0, a set and
a map seem to treat a java.util.ArrayList differently with respect to its
equivalence to a vector.
https://gist.github.com/duelinmarkers/7c9f84cfc238e5d37a09

user=> (-> {} (assoc [1 2] "vec") (assoc (java.util.ArrayList. [1 2]) "alist"))
{[1 2] "alist"}
user=> (-> #{} (conj [1 2]) (conj (java.util.ArrayList. [1 2])))
*#{[1 2]}*
user=> *clojure-version*
{:major 1, :minor 5, :incremental 1, :qualifier nil}

;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

user> (-> {} (assoc [1 2] "vec") (assoc (java.util.ArrayList. [1 2]) "alist"))
{[1 2] "alist"}
user> (-> #{} (conj [1 2]) (conj (java.util.ArrayList. [1 2])))
*#{[1 2] [1 2]}*
user> *clojure-version*
{:major 1, :minor 6, :incremental 0, :qualifier nil}

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to