Op dinsdag 6 mei 2014 12:40:24 UTC+2 schreef James Reeves:
>
> Well, == should be =, but more importantly you're mixing up number and 
> counter.
>
> Step through your code one bit at a time:
>
> 1. You set number to 0
> 2. You set counter to (count coll) - 2
> 3. If number and counter are not equal...
> 4. Recur with the next part of the list, and set the counter to (+ number 
> 1)
>
> See how you've got counter and number mixed up?
>


Yep, 

So I change it to this : 

 (defn secondlast [coll]
    (let [number 0 ]
      (loop [coll coll counter (- (count coll)2)]
        (if (= counter number)
          (first coll)
          (recur (next coll) (+ number 1))))))

But when I do  (secondlast (list 1 2 3 4 5))
I still do not get a answer, 

Roelof


> - James
>
>
> On 6 May 2014 11:24, Roelof Wobben <rwo...@hotmail.com <javascript:>>wrote:
>
>> I changed everything to this :
>>
>> (ns forclojure.core)
>>   (defn secondlast [coll]
>>     (let [number 0 ]
>>       (loop [coll coll counter (- (count coll)2)]
>>
>>         (if (== counter number)
>>           (first coll)
>>           (recur (next coll) (+ number 1))))))
>>
>>
>> But now I get a loop which never ends.
>>
>> Roelof
>>
>>
>> Op dinsdag 6 mei 2014 10:51:09 UTC+2 schreef Roelof Wobben:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Op dinsdag 6 mei 2014 10:43:40 UTC+2 schreef Benjamin R. Haskell:
>>>>
>>>> `loop` expects a vector of binding forms (with initial values), not 
>>>> just a vector of names.
>>>>
>>>> (loop [coll counter]    ; means there is one `loop` binding named 
>>>> `coll`, with the initial value of `counter`
>>>>
>>>> To fix that problem directly:
>>>>
>>>> (loop [coll    coll      ; coll starts with an initial value of its 
>>>> value outside the loop
>>>>        counter counter]  ; counter starts with an initial value of its 
>>>> value outside the loop
>>>> ;; rest of code here ...
>>>>
>>>> Then you're left with an extra `let` (which was serving a similar 
>>>> purpose to `loop` initialization?), and the whole `loop` is possibly 
>>>> superfluous, because a function can be the target of a `recur`.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>  oke, so I could do (loop [ coll coll counter 0]  instead of the let ?
>>>  And what do you mean with superfluous ??
>>>
>>> Roelof
>>>
>>>  -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Clojure" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to