2014-05-05 5:48 GMT+02:00 Wei Hsu <yayits...@gmail.com>: > Perhaps Cecil is referring to this article, Clojure web security is worse > than you > think<https://hackworth.be/2014/03/26/clojure-web-security-is-worse-than-you-think/>, > describing > the immature state of Clojure's web security libraries. I >
No, it was suggested that for secure programming you needed to do it modular and that this was not possible with a functional language. But off-course this is important also. -- Cecil Westerhof -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.