I recently started using livejs.

It's fucking awesome.

basically livejs + lein cljsbuild auto (without cljx) + optimizations :none =

* I edit code in emacs.
* I hit C-x C-s
* I see compiling window flyby in milliseconds.
* I see browser reload.

This is happiness. :-)

On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Dave Sann <daves...@gmail.com> wrote:
> or livejs
>
> http://livejs.com/
>
>
> On Sunday, 6 April 2014 04:58:51 UTC+10, Henrik Eneroth wrote:
>>
>> If that is your criterion, use something that reloads the browser
>> automatically when the js is changed. I use CodeKit personally.
>>
>> On Wednesday, April 2, 2014 10:09:45 PM UTC+2, lypanov wrote:
>>>
>>> I hate REPLs. I also hate large compile times.
>>> For me the hardest part of the ~5s compile time is not waiting, it's the
>>> watching of the progress of the auto build and waiting until exactly that
>>> moment
>>> before pressing reload in the browser.
>>>
>>> That being said, I find "run this currently selected code block in my
>>> connected browser" functionality in editors (lighttable is the one I
>>> use/know) to be
>>> the best solution to this problem. It's painful as hell at first though.
>>>
>>> I had a work around in the past via a fork of noir-cljs which would delay
>>> the load of the .js files until compile completed via some hacks but
>>> now that I've switched to a browser <> editor work flow I find myself
>>> doing as much work as possible in the editor via the "run it in the browser
>>> REPL"
>>> script tag trick from  lighttable that I'm no longer even noticing
>>> compile times. I leave them to the end of the pomodoro.
>>>
>>> On Friday, March 21, 2014 7:48:59 AM UTC+1, t x wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> *  I'm already using:
>>>>
>>>>   :incremental true
>>>>   :compiler { :optimizations :none }
>>>>
>>>> * I'm also aware of cljs brepl
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> However:
>>>>
>>>> 1) the cljs compiler is still too slow for my liking (even though it's
>>>> not calling closure)
>>>>
>>>> 2) I don't like the cljs repl nearly as much as I like the clj repl
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Now, my dumb/stupid question:
>>>>
>>>>   Is there any cljs in cljs _slow_ interpreter? I'm perfectly happy
>>>> with an interpreter that runs 10x slower, if, in exchange, I get to
>>>> hit "refresh" and my new code starts running.
>>>>
>>>>   Furthermore, I'm _okay_ with their being a big delay every time I
>>>> introduce a new macro from clj land.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   I realize this sounds spoiled -- but -- the cljs compiler delays are
>>>> really really breaking my flow.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to