I knew there was another one out there, but couldn't remember whose... ! Thanks...
On Friday, April 4, 2014 2:36:59 PM UTC-5, Fogus wrote: > > I prefer Unfix --> http://fogus.me/fun/unfix/ ;-) > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Alex Miller > <al...@puredanger.com<javascript:>> > wrote: > > Incanter supports this with the $= prefix: > > ($= 7 + 8 - 2 * 6 / 2) > > > > http://data-sorcery.org/2010/05/14/infix-math/ > > > > Might be worth looking at... > > > > > > On Thursday, April 3, 2014 11:17:32 PM UTC-5, Joshua Brulé wrote: > >> > >> Proposal: > >> > >> For an *odd* number of forms a, x, b, ... > >> > >> {a x b x c ...} => (x a b c ...) > >> {a x b y c ...} => (*nfx* a x b y c ...) > >> > >> Reasoning: > >> > >> Even after a lot of practice, prefix math is still harder (at least for > >> me...) to read than non-prefix math. The [], () and <> matching > delimiters > >> are already taken, but {} is only used for an even number of forms > (and, in > >> fact, throws an exception on an odd number of forms.) > >> > >> ; trumped-up examples > >> (defn harmonic-mean [x1 x2] > >> {{2 * x1 * x2} / {x1 + x2}}) > >> > >> (defn fib [n] > >> (cond > >> {n = 0} 1 > >> {n = 1} 1 > >> :else {(fib {n - 1}) + (fib {n - 2})})) > >> > >> Basically, I'm claiming a solid win on readability, and no risk of > >> breaking any existing code. > >> > >> I realize there's a certain risk of mistaking curly-infix for a map > >> literal when reading code, but I think it's minimal. To me, at least, > {x + > >> y} just doesn't look like a map. > >> > >> Thoughts? > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Clojure" group. > > To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com<javascript:> > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your > > first post. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > --- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > "Clojure" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an > > email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > > -- > -- http://blog.fogus.me > -- http://github.com/fogus > -- > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
