Great to hear, I'm looking forward to progress :)

4. apr. 2014 kl. 14:45 skrev Alex Miller <a...@puredanger.com>:

> I agree that we cannot (yet) cut support for Java 6 but we continue to watch 
> polls and usage closely.  Java 6 has been EOL'ed for a while now and usage 
> continues to drop. However, there are a few minor JDK-specific bits already 
> in Clojure and it would be entirely possible to handle separate paths for 6 
> and 7.
> 
> The major concern is with the stability and *predictability* of 
> invokedynamic. indy has undergone major revisions between Java 7 and 8 so it 
> may be that what needs to be done is substantially different between the two. 
> My impression from watching the work of people like Charles Nutter is that it 
> requires a lot of flag tweaking to make it work reliably. It also seems that 
> when you go off the fast path, you can go over a cliff with performance. 
> **These are my impressions - they could be wrong.** For these reasons, it has 
> not been high on the priority list, but having more work or data on this 
> would be great. I am not speaking for Rich here, but my guess is that this is 
> compatible with his thoughts.
> 
> One of my first efforts for 1.7 is going to be working out how to support 
> multiple Clojure builds for different purposes (such as lean runtime, 
> Android, whatever) - this is foundational work that can open up the 
> possibility of specialized Clojure builds, such as an invokedynamic-aware 
> version.
> 
> Alex
> 
> On Friday, April 4, 2014 5:09:16 AM UTC-5, Plinio Balduino wrote:
> The guys from core team will correct me if I say any bs, but I think it's not 
> possible to keep Clojure compatible with Java 6, as Clojure 1.6 is, and use 
> InvokeDynamic bytecode in the same binary. DynJS, for example, is not 
> compatible with Java 6. 
> 
> Anyway, it would be nice to see any experiment with that bytecode and 
> Clojure, maybe evolving to some form of Clojure 2.0. 
> 
> It would be nice to hear the core team and/or Hickey's position about it. 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Plinio Balduino
> 
> On 04/04/2014, at 06:44, Robin Heggelund Hansen <skinn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Yeah, those were the blog posts I've read, but I can't see that this is 
>> actually being worked on for Clojure?
>> 
>> 4. apr. 2014 kl. 11:43 skrev Plínio Balduino <pbal...@gmail.com>:
>> 
>>> Hi, Hansen
>>> 
>>> Fogus (from here) and Nutter (from JRuby) wrote nice posts about it. 
>>> 
>>> http://blog.fogus.me/2011/10/14/why-clojure-doesnt-need-invokedynamic-but-it-might-be-nice/
>>> 
>>> http://blog.headius.com/2011/10/why-clojure-doesnt-need-invokedynamic.html?m=1
>>> 
>>> Plinio Balduino
>>> 11 982 611 487
>>> 
>>> On 04/04/2014, at 05:42, Robin Heggelund Hansen <skinn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi!
>>>> 
>>>> Did someone ever look at supporting InvokeDynamic for Clojure? I've read a 
>>>> couple of blogs and it seemed interesting, would be cool to know if there 
>>>> actually were any advantages in practice.
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com
>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>>>> your first post.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>>> --- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "Clojure" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>>> email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com
>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>>> your first post.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
>>> Google Groups "Clojure" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/clojure/vNXIfkgRRkI/unsubscribe.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
>>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
>> first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Clojure" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google 
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/clojure/vNXIfkgRRkI/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to