Thank you again Ben, now it is more clear. Luca
Il giorno giovedì 27 marzo 2014 16:43:51 UTC+1, Ben Mabey ha scritto: > > If you want or need to block in a go-block then you should use the > `thread` macro instead of the `go` macro. A thread macro block will be ran > in a cached thread pool as you seem to be wanting: > > > https://github.com/clojure/core.async/blob/master/src/main/clojure/clojure/core/async.clj#L379 > > Just note that you will need to use the blocking CSP operator variants, > e.g. <!! instead of <!, while inside of `thread`. > > -Ben > > On 3/27/14, 9:24 AM, icamts wrote: > > Thank you Ben. > > Can we speculate on a go-off macro? Like in agents send / send-off to > have go-off blocks executed by a cached thread pool executor? > > Luca > > Il giorno giovedì 27 marzo 2014 16:01:16 UTC+1, Ben Mabey ha scritto: >> >> I asked Timothy Baldridge about this on IRC when the change was made >> that added 42 and this was the reply I got: >> >> we're trying to strike a balance there, we don't want people to do IO >> inside a go block, but if they have to we'd don't want it to totally stall >> out. >> >> Here is the full conversation: >> >> http://clojure-log.n01se.net/date/2013-08-29.html#15:45a >> >> -Ben >> >> On 3/27/14, 8:55 AM, icamts wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> quite a funny question. Thread pool size in core.async is twice the >> number of processors plus 42. >> >> >> https://github.com/clojure/core.async/blob/master/src/main/clojure/clojure/core/async/impl/exec/threadpool.clj >> >> >> 42? The question is: >> >> 1) should it be 4 or 2? >> 2) 42 is the response to life, universe and everything >> 3) for some technical reason 42 is also a good minimum number for a >> thread pool >> >> Luca >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Clojure" group. >> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >> your first post. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Clojure" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
