combine can be made more succinct by destructuring the input directly: (defn combine [[mi ma su co] y] [(min mi y) (max ma y) (+ su y) (+ 1 co)])
As for the main function, my tendency would be to avoid taking cases on the number of args: (defn mimasuco [& s] (reduce combine [Double/POSITIVE_INFINITY Double/NEGATIVE_INFINITY 0 0] s)) But overall, yes, this kind of use of reduce is certainly idiomatic. loop-recur is another option. Also, you could do something like this which is nice and clear (works on sequence, not variable args) but it would be slower: (def mimasuco (juxt #(apply min %) #(apply max %) #(apply + %) count)) All reasonable approaches, I think. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
