Cool, Kiss. >From my 2 cent, the solid is important to the clojure, and the core team is making any change carefully, but looks to me that the `radical` idea is important to the community and clojure as well, might that we need a branch of clojure to do some `radical` attempt and experiment, it is the clojure's incubator.
On Monday, March 3, 2014 10:06:33 AM UTC+8, Mikera wrote: > > > > 2) Dynamic dispatch: If you look into the details, a lot of Clojure > functions have an "Object" argument and end up doing a serious of instance? > checks or other methods to achieve dynamic dispatch. This is expensive and > unnecessary in many cases, since you can often prove that the argument must > be of a specific type (e.g. java.lang.String). This is fixable, but would > require smarter type inference in the Clojure compiler itself. Again this > is something I'm experimenting with in Kiss, it might also be fixed in a > future Clojure-in-Clojure compiler. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
