It depends also on your requirements. For example if you want your app to work in many deployment scenarios (standalone Jetty or Tomcat, J2EE web containers...) and you may have to use servlet 3.0 API asynchronous features, nothing beats pedestal currently.
The concept of interceptors is little harder to grok then simple ring handlers (which are reused to the greatest possible extent anyway), but they really make sense and truly decomplect execution order, unlike traditional ring wrapping handlers. The routing systems is also more transparent (data based) then Compojure macro routing and the url generation facility is nice. Sometimes i hear people say that pedestal is "unclojurish" and complex, but i think they just don't get the difference between complex and easy. Overall, i think that pedestal represents core clojure philosophy better then any other clojure server side framework. Dňa streda, 26. februára 2014 2:13:30 UTC+1 Aravindh S napísal(-a): > > Hi All, > I have been reading clojure for sometime now. I am at a point where I > want to learn a web framework. I see many options available for clojure > where few are built upon others. So if I am to learn one, which framework > does the community recommend? > > Thanks > Aravindh.S > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
