I've started doing some more serious testing and have not encountered any problems so far. I was a bit worried about the interaction of splice and transient/persistent!, but have not encountered any problems yet. I am going to read through the code again to satisfy myself that there is no issue lurking here.
I'll put together some proper testcases and add them to my repo. thanks for your interest :-) Jules On Monday, 17 February 2014 09:28:28 UTC, Jean Niklas L'orange wrote: > > > > On Sunday, February 16, 2014 11:49:38 AM UTC+1, Mikera wrote: >> >> Wow - that's a pretty big win. I think we should try and get this into >> Clojure ASAP. >> >> Are we too late for 1.6? >> > > Yeah, this is probably too late for 1.6 =/ > > Anyway, cool stuff you got going on here. I'm playing around with similar > functions myself (for a variant of RRB-Trees), but ended up with several > issues when I attempted to splice trees which shared structure. Is there > any indication that this will be an issue? An easy way to check this out is > to generate a large random map/set, then randomly generate maps/sets based > on the large one by cutting off random elements. Then you randomly splice > those maps/sets repeatedly, repeat the cutting, and continue with the > splicing. > > -- JN > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
