"John D. Hume" <duelin.mark...@gmail.com> writes: > On Feb 11, 2014 4:41 AM, "Phillip Lord" <phillip.l...@newcastle.ac.uk> > wrote: >> >> Is the only place this is written down is by working reading the >> implementing classes? > > I believe so. Other than the new (and quite minimal) Java API for calling > Clojure code[1], the details of Clojure's underlying Java classes are > considered implementation details and could change from release to release > without being considered a breaking change.
And the interfaces? I mean, ISeq is defines the sequence abstraction. Phil -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
