I can ensure all of you that it is very uncomfortable for a newcomer with a goofy nick to just come in and say things are broke LOL . So at that point I have two choices:
1) as suggested, find another programming language but that would mean that I would have to erase my Clojure tattoo (very painful). 2) stop making enemies and pretend that seq on sets is cools and neat and we really do not need to stick to fundeaments of FP: a=b => f(a) = f(b) in critical part of the language. It ain't going to happen either. Although, the worst part about it all is that my carefully crafted piece of software used for controlling nuclear power plants relies on Clojure set-s. As we above some part of it is non deterministic as the calculated controls paramters depends on the order of adding elements to set .... That literally sucks! In any case, see you at Clojure West conference and thanks again for all the replies, Best regards, Andy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
