On Friday, February 7, 2014 10:17:15 PM UTC-6, Andy C wrote: > > But what really bothers me is that laziness / not laziness affects the > result of evaluation as in above example. That is against some fundamental > rules of FP (gotta check how Haskell does it :-P). >
Well, it's not really laziness that's affecting the result of evaluation, in the sense that you mean. It's just the design decision that the result of evaluation should always be the same type. mapv does the same thing, but returns a vector. Giving functions polymorphic return types makes things more complicated. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
