To override the default tiered compilation, add this to your project.clj:

:jvm-opts ^:replace []

I would also recommend using a newer JDK (preferably 7, but at least 6). 


On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 4:34:12 PM UTC-6, David Nolen wrote:
>
> You need to make sure that you are running with server settings. If you 
> are using lein, it's likely that this is not the case unless you have 
> overridden lein's defaults in your project.clj.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Glen Fraser <hola...@gmail.com<javascript:>
> > wrote:
>
>> Thanks, yes, the version starting with 0.0 in the loop (rather than 0) 
>> does run faster.  In my case, about 13% faster (19.7 seconds -- for the 
>> code you pasted below, with *unchecked-math*, type hints and starting x of 
>> 0.0 -- vs 22.7 seconds for my original version).  But if you start with x 
>> of 0 (integer), the type-hinted version runs notably slower.  In all cases, 
>> though, at least you get the same final answer… (-;
>>
>> So I don't see that 50% speedup you're seeing, but I do see improvement. 
>>  I'm on Clojure 1.5.1, and Java 1.7.0_51 on OS X 10.8.5, running in an 
>> nREPL (cider) in Emacs.  Possibly other JDK versions have more 
>> optimizations?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Glen.
>>
>> On Feb 5, 2014, at 10:56 PM, David Nolen <dnolen...@gmail.com<javascript:>> 
>> wrote:
>>
>> (set! *unchecked-math* true)
>> (defn g ^double [^double x] (+ (Math/sin (* 2.3 x)) (Math/cos (* 3.7 x))))
>> (time (loop [i 100000000 x 0.0] (if (pos? i) (recur (dec i) (g x)) x)))
>>  
>> This is nearly 50% faster than the original version on my machine. Note 
>> that x is bound to 0.0 in the loop, which allows the optimized g to be 
>> invoked.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Glen Fraser <hola...@gmail.com<javascript:>
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks to both of you for these suggestions, they're good to know.  In 
>>> my specific case, setting the *unchecked-math* flag true did indeed speed 
>>> things up slightly (by about 6%).  The other change, though, with the 
>>> double type hints (I assume that's what those are), actually ran notably 
>>> slower (over 20% slower!).
>>>
>>> Glen.
>>>
>>> On Feb 5, 2014, at 8:13 PM, David Nolen <dnolen...@gmail.com<javascript:>> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Also:
>>>
>>> (defn g ^double [^double x] (+ (Math/sin (* 2.3 x)) (Math/cos (* 3.7 
>>> x))))
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Alex Miller 
>>> <al...@puredanger.com<javascript:>
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Others have answered with many useful bits but I would mention that it 
>>>> would possibly make a significant performance difference if you added this 
>>>> to your code:
>>>>
>>>> (set! *unchecked-math* true)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>  -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Clojure" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to