On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Brian Marick <mar...@exampler.com> wrote: > I always grate at the need to then "immortalize" the core of what I did in > the REPL in repeatable tests.
That's actually one of the things that bothered me in the Emacs REPL world: working in the REPL was separate from working in my production source and my test source. It's one of the things that has me really hooked on LightTable. I have my source and test namespaces both open. I have them both connected to a "REPL". I can evaluate any code, in place, in either file. If I grow some code in the source file, I can put (defn some-name [args]) in front of it and M-) slurps it into a function - done! If I grow some code in the test file, I can put (expect result-value) in front of it and M-) slurps it into a test - done! Since I moved to LightTable, I've found myself doing even more REPL-Driven-Development than before because it's so much easier to turn the experiments into code - or tests - in place. -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/ "Perfection is the enemy of the good." -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
