http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ROor6_NGIWU
Around 56:28 Rich is talking about whether components pass a data structure, or "an object that has all these verbs and knows how to do stuff ...". Clojure data types also have verbs, in protocols, and if one component passes a record to another component, the receiver will need to use those verbs to make use of the data. How is that different than the OOP example? There's the syntactic difference that in OOP you write it object, verb, arguments, and in clojure you write it verb, object, arguments. But that's trivial. How is it architecturally different to pass an object with methods vs passing a record with protocol? -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
