As a suffix to my last reply; if Hy were capable of delivering acceptable truthy semantics and persistent data structures, I might recommend it.
On Saturday, January 4, 2014 9:44:08 AM UTC-8, g vim wrote: > > On 04/01/2014 17:28, gaz jones wrote: > > Why not just use Ruby or (my preference) Python? Both are great for > > quick CLI apps / scripts. Best tool for the job, and all that? > > > > A Clojure layer on top of Ruby means less context switching which works > better for me as the Lisp mindset is very different from Ruby or Python. > However, I just looked at the Rouge docs and very little seems to have > been implemented so maybe it's dying. If so, I'll go with Hy which looks > much more mature. > > gvim > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
