On Thursday, December 26, 2013 10:26:11 PM UTC+1, Gary Trakhman wrote: > > "If I were to implement something (complex enough) in C and C++ the > differences between my implementations would be far from superficial." > > Those are both inexpressive in different ways. In my opinion java is > closer to lisp than C++, given garbage collection, closures (even faked by > objects), reflection (code-as-data), classloading (eval). >
You can do metaprogramming in C++ (with templates, which are Turing-complete) and now it supports closures and many other things. Unfortunately, it's become too complex. D would be a better choice if only it was more popular. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
