On 5 December 2013 20:58, Gary Trakhman <gary.trakh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is possible with atoms and refs and such, but I wonder if the > use-case can't simply be handled with existing seq functions? > > This is going against the grain of clojure's FP approach. > Right. It would be useful to know why this functionality is required. It's either a really unusual use-case, or it's something that could be better expressed in a functional style. - James -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
