Thanks guys for the useful answers :)
Ryan
On Wednesday, December 4, 2013 1:27:57 AM UTC+2, James Ferguson wrote:
>
> `update-in` could be helpful, depending on what exactly you're doing.
>
> (doseq [keyA keys, keyB otherkeys]
> (update-in m [keyA keyB] some-function))
>
> On Tuesday, December 3, 2013 6:05:14 PM UTC-5, Ryan wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am trying to figure out a better way to loop the following map than
>> using nested doseq. The map has the following structure:
>>
>> (def m
>>> {"outerKeyA" {:innerKeyA {"string id" {:foo 1 :bar 2}}}
>>> "outerKeyB" {:innerKeyB {"string id" {:bar 5 :baz 10}}}})
>>
>>
>> So, right now i am doing the following:
>>
>> (doseq [[outer-keys collections] m]
>>> (doseq [[collection-name collection] collections]
>>> (doseq [[string-id data] collection]
>>> ;; do stuff with all the above
>>> )))
>>
>>
>> Is there a more idiomatic/better way to do deeply nested
>> iterations/traversal of map of maps?
>>
>> Thank you for any replies!
>>
>> Ryan
>>
>>
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
