I wrote a macro last night and got the feeling I did what I did in a suboptimal way.
I have have a migration function that I stole from technomancy that takes in the vars of migration functions: (migrate #'create-db #'add-users-table #'etc) It uses the name of the var from the metadata to record which migrations have been run. I wanted to try to make it so you didn't have to explicitly pass in the vars, and just have the migrate function call var for you. I've since decided this is a bad idea but I wrote the macro anyway just for fun. My first question is: could this be done without a macro? I didn't see how since if you write it as a function, all you recieve are the actual functions and not the vars, but I thought I'd ask to be sure. Assuming you did have to write a macro, does this implementation seem reasonable? I felt strange about using (into [] ...). https://www.refheap.com/21335 Basically I'm trying to get from (migrate f g h) to (migrate* (var f) (var g) (var h)), I'm not sure I'm doing it right. Thanks, Curtis. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
