On Thu Nov 21 07:14:16 2013, Stuart Sierra wrote:
On Thursday, November 21, 2013 7:22:10 AM UTC-5, abp wrote:
> Why do you prefer declaring dependencies between
> components of a system explicitly instead of using
> prismatics Graph?
'Graph' by itself does not preserve the dependency
relationships after constructing the map. But the two
approaches are not incompatible: you can use 'Graph' to
construct the system map, then use 'Component' to manage it.
-S
If you are interesting in taking that approach you can use my
system-graph which does just that:
https://github.com/RedBrainLabs/system-graph
I spoke with Stuart at the conj about this library and I realized that
system-graph it is currently relying on an implementation detail in
order to work. I haven't had any issues with it but I can see places
where it will not work. I plan on fixing this issue so the proper
'Component' metadata is attached to the system-graph. When I do that
I'll release v0.2.0.
-Ben
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.