I'm not sure I agree with the intent of the patch (as I can certainly 
imagine times when I'd want a pure map from select-keys, not one that has 
the characteristics of the source map).

Also, due to empty not being supported on records (yet - separate ticket 
for that), I think this breaks select-keys for records, which would be bad 
as that is a common usage. [This would imply sequencing of changes.]


On Friday, November 1, 2013 9:39:57 AM UTC-5, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
>
> Looks like a reasonable enhancement to me.  I have filed ticket CLJ-1287 
> with a proposed patch for it:
>
>     http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1287
>
> No guarantees when or if it will get into Clojure.  You can modify your 
> own local copy of select-keys (or even alter-var-root its definition) if 
> you would like the new behavior sooner, for yourself.
>
> By the way, there is a funjible.set library published on Github that is 
> like clojure.set except it has preconditions that its arguments are sets or 
> maps, the functions have longer more explicit doc strings, and there are a 
> few behavior changes like ensuring metadata or sortedness of return values.
>
>     https://github.com/jafingerhut/funjible
>
> Andy
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Don Jackson <
> clo...@clark-communications.com <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>>
>> select-keys currently returns a regular hash-map, regardless of the kind 
>> of map provided as the input argument.
>>
>> Alternately, select-keys could call empty on it’s map argument to obtain 
>> the map it will return,  thereby preserving the type of map provided.
>>
>> FYI, Mark Engelberg recently pushed a change to data.priority-map that 
>> ensures that the specific flavor of priority-map is preserved through calls 
>> to empty…
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Clojure" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>
>

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to