On Thursday, October 31, 2013 10:37:33 PM UTC-5, Mikera wrote: > > OTOH, count is much more generic since it can handle arbitrary sequences > etc. Also count doesn't require type hints. You should definitely prefer > count when writing most high level code. >
Yes, I'd prefer count in higher level code over .length for easier Clojure / ClojureScript code sharing. For what it's worth, src/clj/clojure/string.clj uses `.length` throughout (except the capitalize function for I don't know why). -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
