There are no plans to change the license.
On Wednesday, September 11, 2013 8:41:04 AM UTC-5, Kalinni Gorzkis wrote: > > I think that Clojure should switch to a better license with similar spirit > like Apache 2.0, BSD, or MIT. > While the EPL doesn't have the evil "copyleft" requirement of GPL, and > therefore allows and encourages commercial uses of the code, it has a > requirement that makes it incompatible with the GPL: If you create modified > versions of EPL-covered software, you must slap your name (or any other > identity) on it. In my humble opinion, this restriction isn't justified. > (All, or most, creators of modified versions will do that anyway). It may > have been chosen uncarefully. Other permissive licenses better fulfill Rich > Hickey's spirit. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
