Thanks :) By the way, it's probably *not* a good idea to use this github-wiki version of clojuredocs. Everyone's still using clojuredocs.org, and we don't want to scatter data (examples, etc) between two websites.
My reason for posting this was to hear the community's thoughts on this alternate implementation and its viability. -Steven On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 5:39 AM, Alex Fowler <alex.murat...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's really cool! Was always wondering if there's gone be something like > that ever.. Gonna be visiting often! Wish also that it'd be near clojuredocs > in search results if you google like "clojure parse", but that'a a different > effort, I suppose.. keep up! > > воскресенье, 8 сентября 2013 г., 12:07:33 UTC+4 пользователь Steven Degutis > написал: >> >> ClojureDocs.org is pretty awesome, I think I use it nearly every day, >> especially for the Examples and See Also sections. But sometimes I've >> been wishing it had Clojure 1.5.1 support. For example, I think as-> >> and cond-> would have been easier for me to pick up had there been >> entries for these with community-driven Examples. >> >> A while back, someone told me "complaining is laziness". So I worked >> on an experiment that I'd like to propose to you all. It's a github >> wiki that's been seeded with data scraped from in-process docs and >> clojuredocs.org's API. Here it is: >> >> https://github.com/sdegutis/clojuredocs/wiki >> >> Pros: >> - Docs are for Clojure 1.5.1 >> - Anyone logged into github can edit it >> - Any part of it can be edited (to fix typos in docstring, etc) >> - All namespaces are shown on the Home page for easy searching >> - Free hosting, free database storage :) >> >> Cons: >> - Doesn't have dynamic relevance-based search field >> - Doesn't have an API (but an external one could be built) >> - Doesn't have Quick Ref tables (yet) >> - A few URLs are kind of ugly >> - The namespace-navigation bar is gone, you'd have to click Home >> - Doesn't store nearly as much data as clojuredocs.org does >> >> (But as usual, pros/cons are totally subjective to individual needs. >> This is just how I saw it. These tables may be reversed for you, who >> knows.) >> >> Right now, it only has core namespaces. But I've made it easy to add >> data from new namespaces, so long as the right dependencies are added >> to project.clj. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> -Steven > > -- > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.