I'm not sure I understand the motivation behind what you're suggesting.
 Why not just (nth tuple 0)?


On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Kevin Downey <redc...@gmail.com> wrote:

> A Tuple protocol that defines get0 get1 get3 etc for fast element access
> that doesn't tie you to using field names might be a good idea.
>
> On 8/25/13 9:35 AM, Zach Tellman wrote:
> > I don't think so, even the existence of all the Tuple* types are an
> > implementation detail, and you'd need to hint it as the right one to get
> > sane performance.  (nth t n) has good performance, you should prefer
> that.
> >
> > On Saturday, August 24, 2013 8:15:40 PM UTC-7, Ben wrote:
> >>
> >> Are the element names .e0, .e1 etc. considered part of the public
> >> interface of tuple objects?
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Zach Tellman <ztel...@gmail.com
> <javascript:>
> >>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I just pulled some code I wrote while trying to optimize 'memoize' into
> >>> its own library: https://github.com/ztellman/clj-tuple.  It only has
> the
> >>> one function, so I assume no one will need too much explanation.
>  However,
> >>> there may still be room for performance improvements, so if anyone
> wants to
> >>> take a stab, pull requests are welcome.
> >>>
> >>> Zach
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> --
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >>> Groups "Clojure" group.
> >>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com
> <javascript:>
> >>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> >>> your first post.
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
> >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> >>> ---
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> >>> "Clojure" group.
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an
> >>> email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
> >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ben Wolfson
> >> "Human kind has used its intelligence to vary the flavour of drinks,
> which
> >> may be sweet, aromatic, fermented or spirit-based. ... Family and social
> >> life also offer numerous other occasions to consume drinks for
> pleasure."
> >> [Larousse, "Drink" entry]
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> And what is good, Phaedrus,
> And what is not good—
> Need we ask anyone to tell us these things?
>
>

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to