How does gen-class etc. fit into this new (ns) world?
On 6/08/2013, at 4:28 AM, Greg <g...@kinostudios.com> wrote: > I haven't put enough thought into this as I could, but this seems good enough > already to kick the ball rolling. > > If the above syntax can't be made to support the old school syntax as well, > another thought would be to create a new name for the declaration, calling it > "include" or something like that instead of "ns". -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
