Le mercredi 7 août 2013, guns a écrit : > On Wed 7 Aug 2013 at 05:35:41PM +0100, Wolodja Wentland wrote: > > > Do you have a particular reason why you didn't simply add this > > functionality to tools.cli ? > > I did think of sending this upstream, but the parser is not the only > point of difference with tools.cli. Given that both libraries are so > small, a patch would have rewritten a majority of the project. > > Large patches require lots of convincing (and in this case, a > Contributer Agreement I have yet to submit), so I just wrote myself a > new implementation for a Clojure mail daemon I was writing. > > tools.cli is, of course, free to swipe the parser from optparse-clj! I > would be happy to see it.
This cannot happen as you describe, afaik. code destined to go in contrib must be explicitly submitted by its author (not just "pulled"), and the author must have signed and sent a contributor agreement. Cheers, Laurent > guns > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
