On Saturday, July 27, 2013 4:46:06 PM UTC-7, Alex Baranosky wrote: > On our work projects at Runa, we have an unwritten code standard of always > writing out the full namespace, and not using shortcuts as you suggest. The > reason being that it can be very hard to search for usages of a namespace if > you don't fully qualify them, which makes refactoring a nightmare on projects with > 250+ namespaces. I agree that using a shared prefix as in the original question is an antipattern.
Maybe things would be different if we had a reliable "find usages" library, but as it is now currently we're stuck relying on grep. The shared-prefix style makes it difficult to find things. -Phil -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
