Yes, I agree with you: better to bind outside the whole repl loop. I misspoke when I said "around the printing".
That said, I think it might still be reasonable to put much tighter bounds on the cotents inside the printing of "#< ... >". David On Thursday, July 11, 2013 3:09:07 PM UTC+3, Meikel Brandmeyer (kotarak) wrote: > > David, > > I wouldn't automatically set any values around the printing. The user > should be free to do what he likes. > > But the repl could start out with some sane defaults, which are not > limiting in the usual case, but safe in general. Like 50 for the level and > 1000 for the length. Then you are not caught by the infitinite recursion, > but still can override the default should the need arise. > > Meikel > > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
