On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Alexander Gunnarson < alexandergunnar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is not implementing expt as it is usually known, it looks more like >>> repeated squaring to me. >>> >> >> Agreed. There's a certain irony that the OP declares the code pure, >> simple, and beautiful, when it isn't correct code. Seems to me that if you >> can't tell at a glance what a 3-line program is doing, there's something >> wrong :) >> > > True. There are much better/more efficient implementations like: > > Your expt code wasn't inefficient; it didn't produce the correct result. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
