Actually, drop filter - just (apply merge sequ) is enough.

On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Alexander Solovyov
<alexan...@solovyov.net>wrote:

> The simplest way I see is
>
> (apply merge (filter identity '({:apple "red and crunchy"} nil nil {:Numb
> 1} nil nil {:Field "FRUIT.Description"})))
>
> results in
>
> {:Field "FRUIT.Description", :Numb 1, :apple "red and crunchy"}
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:01 PM, VaedaStrike 
> <supercriticalfl...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> So I have data structure that's equivalent to the following—
>>
>> ({:apple "red and crunchy"} nil nil {:Numb 1} nil nil {:Field
>> "FRUIT.Description"})
>>
>> and I'm trying to combine the maps into a single map and I'm just being
>> flummoxed
>>
>> I tried destructuring it and then applying a merge to the maps while not
>> touching the 'nil's but I'm not getting that to work, here's the code I
>> tried—
>>
>>
>> (def sequ ({:apple "red and crunchy"} nil nil {:Numb 1} nil nil {:Field
>> "FRUIT.Description"}))
>> ::The above is just representing the structure I get from a previous
>> parse function.
>> ;; If there's a way to alter this so it works with what I'm trying to do
>> please
>> ;; let me know, or if I'm just doing it all wrong let me know as well!!
>>
>>
>> (defn extract-n-merge-map [sequ]
>>   (let [(a _ _ b _ _ c) sequ]
>>     (merge a b c)))
>>
>> ;; This is giving me "unsupported binding form: (a _ _ b _ _ c) at line
>> ..."
>>
>> Basically I'm using instaparse to take a block of code in another
>> language and trying to automate it's transformation to a new format.
>>
>> I thought that parsing out and taging it's components in a map would give
>> me an overall process that would make other such
>> automatons in the future much easier, but since this is my first attempt
>> at using clojure to do something productive I'm just
>> riddled with noobness and it's just getting so frustrating to have gotten
>> this far and not being able to figure out how to get over the
>> last hump.
>>
>> --
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Clojure" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>>
>>
>
>

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to