On 13/06/13 18:28, Leon Barrett wrote:
It shouldn't be necessary to examine the source to know what's going
on in a builtin, really, but I also encountered this one recently. The
way the extend-protocol macro finds which entries are types and which
are function definitions is by checking which are lists.
I'm not sure I follow...if we can't have lists that evaluate to Class
objects then how am I able to succesfully use (Class/forName "[D") as
the first extension but not in any other position?
should I be using (eval (Class/forName "[D")) so the macro definitely
receives a Class?
You say you've encountered this a lot...can you elaborate? what did you do?
many many thanks,
Jim
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
