A map seems enough, unless there is a need for naming the set of functions, in which case the protocol could serve this purpose. But would that be the best way? I'm also curious to know what solutions the community has come up with about this. In the case of dynamic discovery of available plugins/services, what solutions are there within the clojure space (i.e. not java/osgi). Are protocols the best way to do this? Any there any kind of plugin discovery and dynamic binding out there?
On Wednesday, June 5, 2013 1:11:57 PM UTC+2, john wrote: > > yes that seems to me, that this better expresses that I'm plugging in a > set of functions. > thanks > > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
