On 01/06/13 13:06, James Reeves wrote:
Why do you use:
(reduce #(conj %1 (f %2)) [] p)
Instead of:
(mapv f p)
?
oops you're right mapv is simpler and has the same effect :)
Also, this looks a lot like what you can achieve with the reducers
library:
(r/fold p-size r/cat r/append! (r/map f (vec coll)))
hmmm...I'll have to think about that for a while...
thanks a lot James :)
I was suspecting it can be simplified...
Jim
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
