Thanks, David! What about (.nth this i) vs (nth this i)? Is that also some optimization trick like direct object's method call vs reflection method call?
On Thursday, May 16, 2013 10:34:16 PM UTC+3, David Nolen wrote: > > It is necessary - integer literals default to primitive long and I'm not > sure if >= will inline if it doesn't have type information in scope. This > bit of noise could probably be removed by improving type inference in the > compiler. > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
