Hi, Am Montag, 13. Mai 2013 10:35:14 UTC+2 schrieb Stuart Sierra: > > > > I believe "lightweight dependency loading system" is an oxymoron. Either > you A) design a new module format and try to get everyone to follow it > (OSGI) or B) build an ad-hoc solution that tries to guess at the right > behavior (JBoss). Either way, application developers still have a mess to > deal with, just with an added layer of complexity. > > If someone out there can fix this problem once and for all, I will buy you > a drink. But you can't bill me for all the drinks you'll need along the > way. ;) > > Write a tool which rebases the dependency in your namespace tree. Et voila. No nifty class loader magic necessary. As long as you always use *ns* to get hold of the namespace name, this should work.
Meikel -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
