On 10 May 2013 11:32, Colin Yates <colin.ya...@gmail.com> wrote: > And please don't think I am making the 'code should stop bad programmers > doing the wrong thing' argument, I'm not (been there, lost). I just know > that if I released a scheduler library and the main construct was a map > containing a LBQ (or in fact any sequence) then I would be inundated with a > bunch of 'I did X to the queue and it broke'.... >
Have you tried it? :) I've authored about 40 Clojure libraries over 5 years, some with data structures with internal components. The number of times someone has said "I did X to this internal data and it broke" is exactly zero. It's never ever happened. So I think you're probably borrowing trouble, and I'd certainly be very surprised if you have any support requests like the one you describe. - James -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
