Yeah, to have an option is a good idea! I just wanted to say, that I wouldn't want it to be removed completely :) As far as I understand, you're making up some library-type project.. Do you have a page or a blog where I could track the progress and be up-to-date with the current version? I think that if you update the JME jars at least once-twice a month, then referencing that repository is very good when working on multiple machines!
вторник, 30 апреля 2013 г., 14:18:06 UTC+4 пользователь Jonathan Fischer Friberg написал: > > I think that for today I will stick with the "lib" folder solution, >> proposed by James, but I encourage the knowledgefull people Jonathan and >> James to work together to deliver a Clojars or Amazonaws online repository >> with more-or-less daily update, since the engine is really well-maintained. >> And a Clojure wrapper? I also think that there is no need to strip away the >> testdata since it contains many materials and shaders good for prototyping >> or prodution. >> > > I think the best solution would be to separate it, that's > my plan. That is, to have "jme" with only the core, and > "jme-extra" or similar, with the extra goodies. > > Jonathan > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.