Yeah, to have an option is a good idea! I just wanted to say, that I 
wouldn't want it to be removed completely :) As far as I understand, you're 
making up some library-type project.. Do you have a page or a blog where I 
could track the progress and be up-to-date with the current version? I 
think that if you update the JME jars at least once-twice a month, then 
referencing that repository is very good when working on multiple machines!

вторник, 30 апреля 2013 г., 14:18:06 UTC+4 пользователь Jonathan Fischer 
Friberg написал:
>
> I think that for today I will stick with the "lib" folder solution, 
>> proposed by James, but I encourage the knowledgefull people Jonathan and 
>> James to work together to deliver a Clojars or Amazonaws online repository 
>> with more-or-less daily update, since the engine is really well-maintained. 
>> And a Clojure wrapper? I also think that there is no need to strip away the 
>> testdata since it contains many materials and shaders good for prototyping 
>> or prodution.
>>
>
> I think the best solution would be to separate it, that's
> my plan. That is, to have "jme" with only the core, and
> "jme-extra" or similar, with the extra goodies.
>
> Jonathan 
>

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to