AtKaaZ <atk...@gmail.com> writes: > Seems like a good idea to have the root binding be nil. How would you > make it check for bound inside the function? do we need some kind of > macro?
If the var has a root binding of nil, then you can't distinguish the cases "explicitly bound to nil" and "root binding", so I think in most cases having no root binding is preferrable. A counter example is *out*, where it makes sense that the root binding is a PrintWriter to standard out. Bye, Tassilo -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
