On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Steven Degutis <sbdegu...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I found that I want to have multiple multi-methods, but grouped > together, much like an interface. > There's no syntax for grouping multimethods, but wouldn't it be good enough to put the defmulti forms near one another? Presumably they'll share a dispatch fn (or some underlying part of their dispatch fns) and maybe a hierarchy (as in clojure.core/make-hierarchy), which makes it easier to see that this set of multimethods goes together. If your concern is making it fool-proof for consumers of your API to defmethod for all the right multimethods, you can easily do :default defmethods that provide a clear error message. Somewhat less easily you could create a macro that expanded into the right set of defmethod forms. That seems excessive to me, but I don't know your context. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
