How does that work: you appear to be iterating over two, unconnected, vectors.
And yes that's an example of the second option but doesn't explain if or why that's the best approach- which was the question ;) On Thursday, 18 April 2013 19:48:40 UTC+1, Alan Malloy wrote: > > (for [[y cols] (map-indexed vector rows) > [x cell] (map-indexed vector cols)] > (display cell y x)) > > ? > > On Thursday, April 18, 2013 3:14:19 AM UTC-7, edw...@kenworthy.info wrote: >> >> So, I want a 2 dimensional array. >> >> I think the best way to implement this is a vector of vectors. >> >> Now I want to display that array drawing each element relative to its >> position in the array. >> >> Is the best way to use doseq and manually maintain the indices? Or is it >> to use nested for-loops manually iterating of the vector-of-vectors? >> > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
