Yes.  That concept of a promiscuous map (great name) is what I'm trying to 
get at.

On Wednesday, 10 April 2013 20:30:52 UTC+1, Cedric Greevey wrote:
>
> The main use for qualified keywords that occurs to me is if you have a 
> "promiscuous map" that will be holding key/value pairs submitted by 
> multiple pieces of code of distinct origins. A big registry of preferences 
> that can be added to by plugins would be an example, with qualified 
> keywords making it much less likely for two plugins to be made that are 
> incompatible with each other because they keep overwriting each others' 
> preferences.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Jim foo.bar <jimpi...@gmail.com<javascript:>
> > wrote:
>
>> On 10/04/13 14:03, Simon Katz wrote:
>>
>>> Second, Clojure supports namespace-qualified keywords, presumably 
>>> because it's possible that different libraries might want to use the same 
>>> keyword for different purposes.
>>>
>>
>> I don't think that is the reason for having namespace-qualified 
>> keywords...different libraries might want to use the same keyword for 
>> different purposes and that is fine - no clashes (or at elast I've not 
>> understood what you mean).
>>
>> It's my understanding that ::foo has (or should have) actual 'meaning' in 
>> whatever namespace it exists whereas :foo doesn’t really have any 'meaning'.
>>
>> I don't really think you want to access your record fields with a 
>> namespace-qualified keyword, do you? How would that work exactly? what if 
>> you got an instance of the record outside the namespace where the 
>> namespace-qualified keyword is defined? It doesn't make sense to me at 
>> all...
>>
>> Jim
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+u...@**googlegroups.com <javascript:>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/**group/clojure?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en>
>> --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to clojure+u...@**googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>
>> .
>>
>>
>>
>

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to