On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Ben Wolfson <wolf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Cedric Greevey <cgree...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Mayank Jain <firesof...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> @DNolen >>> The link to the pdf looks broken. Any other link? >>> >> >> Point on language use: "looks broken"? If you actually tried it and it >> didn't work then it *is* broken, pretty much by definition, >> > > Is it a matter of definition that if you try to follow a link and can't, > the fault lies with the link, and not with anything on your end? > If the link doesn't work, but browsing in general and posting to the list does, then very likely yes. IOW, Mayank Jain would presumably have noticed if his attempt to post saying the link was broken failed, and then trying to google the error message or something like that failed, and he then reset his network adapter or whatever and tried again ... and would have tried the link again first, in case his lost connection had been the cause and not an actual broken link. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
