On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Bill Robertson <billrobertso...@gmail.com>wrote:
> While it may violate the principle of least surprise (until you > realize/learn that try/catch is a special form), I don't think it's a bug. > Since there's no good engineering reason not to permit macros like (rethrow ...) to work, it is a bug. Also, pointing out that macros that can break this property is something of a straw man when I'm indicating that something *built into the language* has the problem. The latter can be a language fault even if the former is not. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
