On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Michał Marczyk <michal.marc...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Could you just preprocess the strings passed to re-pattern (or > patterns if you're getting those as input) to replace literal newlines > with escape sequences? I'm assuming you don't care about ?x given the > result you wish to achieve. > Thanks for brainstorming with me on this. This was the strategy I pursued before Mikhail pointed out about how ?x changes the semantics of literal newlines. I don't know how important the ?x is, but I am reluctant to change the potential semantics of the regular expression for the sake of printing. Tonight I tried the strategy of keeping the literal newlines in, but doing that sort of substitution (replacing literal whitespace with escape sequences) right before printing. It seems to be working so far, so I'm keeping my fingers crossed. --Mark -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
