(first | first coll) ; (first (first coll)) (count | first | second coll) ; (count (first (second coll))) (nth % 2 | first coll) ; (nth (first coll) 2)
How is this better than the threading macro? (-> coll first first) (-> coll second first count) (-> coll first (nth 2)) Timothy Baldridge On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Antoine Noo <antoine...@gmail.com> wrote: > Some idea for alternative clojure syntax: > > (first | first coll) ; (first (first coll)) > (count | first | second coll) ; (count (first (second coll))) > (nth % 2 | first coll) ; (nth (first coll) 2) > > (+ 1)# ; (partial + 1) > (+ 1 (* 2))## ; (fn [nb] (+ 1 (* 2 %)) > > (count | first | second)## ; (fn [coll] (count (first (second coll)))) > (nth | first | second coll)# ; (fn [nb] (nth (first (second coll)) nb)) > > > > 2013/3/25 Laurent PETIT <laurent.pe...@gmail.com> > >> As stated in the web site, there are sometimes different needs while >> creating/editing, and while reading. >> >> I see no need to create a second edition syntax. >> >> It may be interesting (and potentially way easier to prototype / play >> with the idea) to only provide alternative "views" of clojure code. >> >> My 0,02€, >> >> -- >> Laurent >> >> 2013/3/25 poetix <dominic....@gmail.com>: >> > I really like the look of this: >> > >> > http://readable.sourceforge.net/ >> > >> > which defines a completely reversible transformation between e.g. >> > >> > define fibfast(n) >> > if {n < 2} >> > n >> > fibup(n 2 1 0) >> > >> > and >> > >> > (define (fibfast n) >> > (if (< n 2) >> > n >> > (fibup n 2 1 0))) >> > >> > >> > and wonder how difficult it would be to support it (or something like >> it) >> > in/for Clojure. A coffeescript-like approach might be a good first step. >> > >> > Any thoughts? >> > >> > Dominic >> > >> > -- >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> > Groups "Clojure" group. >> > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >> > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >> your >> > first post. >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> > For more options, visit this group at >> > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >> > --- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups >> > "Clojure" group. >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >> an >> > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> > >> > >> >> -- >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Clojure" group. >> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >> your first post. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Clojure" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> >> >> > -- > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- “One of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was that–lacking zero–they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C programs.” (Robert Firth) -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
