Ok, but how do you take account of different processing (or non processing) needs in the handler (chain) given that something is awry half way down?
(note that in my case the handler is not pure - the validation precedes the need for a state change. The state change should occur if the validation passes and must not if it fails. I can't validate in advance because that would lead to a race condition). On Wednesday, 20 March 2013 23:24:48 UTC+11, Marko Topolnik wrote: > > On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 1:06:54 PM UTC+1, Dave Sann wrote: > >> Marko, do you have a good example of doing what you say? >> > > What I had in mind, related to OP's post, would be a middleware that does > > (binding [*validation-failures* []] > (handler req) > (do-something-about *validation-failures*)) > > There would be a global function, such as *add-failure*, which would *conj > * a new failure to the vector. > > -marko > > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
